I saw To Save a Life yesterday, and I was curious to see what the general public reaction to it was. I must say, I wasn’t surprised by what I found. But I’ll get to that in a second. First, what did I think?
I’m a Christian, and I typically hate Christian movies. Left Behind? Not really a fan. Fireproof? Decent message but a little cheesy and poorly done. Unfortunately, Hollywood makes movies to make money, and they don’t think that Christian messages sell well, so the standard “Christian Movie” fare has been traditionally low-budget and/or amateur production. To Save a Life breaks that mold.
The message was distinctly Christian, but not in a really preachy way. The quality of the acting and production of the movie was actually quite good. The plot was fairly powerful for me, and even more so for the couple dozen students I watched it with. I was, in a word, impressed.
To be sure, this movie does have a Christian theme to it: not preachy, but definitely present. For that reason, I wasn’t at all surprised to find that a lot of critics treated it fairly harshly. The Gospel isn’t popular for a lot of people, and even less so (or so it seems) for the media. But the encouraging thing is just that: the biggest complaints were not the production value, but the message being portrayed. Finally, a Christian movie done right.
Possibly the biggest surprise though was the positive review of To Save a Life posted in the LA Times: the overall impression is “this is a deftly acted, generally absorbing cautionary tale with wider allure than its faith-based label may imply.” Thank you Gary, for judging the movie without an automatic dismissal due to its Christian content.
All in all I give this movie a 9/10. It’s not perfect, but it’s well-produced, the script is pretty solid, and it’s definitely hard-hitting for teens and tweens. If you’re a Christian, you can actually take your non-Christian friend to see it and they won’t hate you for it. And that’s saying something!








